{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e3","_id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e3","slug":"research-writing","__v":0,"authorId":"6936f979d7261087a227d955","categories":["Writing & Publishing","Career & Work"],"certificateAvailable":true,"createdAt":"2026-09-04T19:02:05.587Z","description":"A complete, step-by-step course in academic research writing — from finding a researchable problem to submitting a paper for peer review. Across six modules you build one project end to end: the problem statement, the literature review, the methodology, the results, the discussion, and the references. Written for Nigerian undergraduates, postgraduates and early-career researchers who have to produce a project, dissertation, thesis or journal article and want to know exactly what each section is for, what it must contain, and how examiners and reviewers read it.","discount":0,"duration":450,"enrolledStudents":1,"featured":false,"instructorId":{"_id":"6936f979d7261087a227d955","displayName":"Mindalitix"},"instructorName":"Mindalitix","instructorProfile":{"_id":"6936f979d7261087a227d955","displayName":"Mindalitix","email":"instructor@mindalitix.com","about":"Default instructor for Mindalitix courses.","education":[],"workExperience":[],"rating":5,"createdAt":"2025-12-09T22:27:58.293Z","updatedAt":"2025-12-09T22:27:58.293Z","__v":0},"level":"all-levels","modules":[{"id":"module_1788548525582_iuxrfsh","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d558","title":"Module 1: Foundations of Research Writing","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_be7tih2","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d559","title":"Lesson 1: What Research Writing Is and Why It Matters","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"# Lesson 1: What Research Writing Is and Why It Matters\n\nWelcome to Research Writing. Over the next six modules you are going to build one research paper from nothing — from a vague interest, through a problem statement, a literature review, a methodology, results and a discussion, all the way to a reference list formatted for submission. This first lesson defines the thing you are learning to do, because most people who struggle with research writing are not struggling with English. They are struggling because nobody ever told them what a research paper is *for*.\n\n## Research writing is not \"writing about a topic\"\n\nIn secondary school you were rewarded for writing everything you knew about a subject. An essay on malaria that mentioned the parasite, the mosquito, the symptoms, the treatment and the prevention was a good essay. It was comprehensive, and comprehensiveness was the goal.\n\nResearch writing inverts this. A research paper is not a display of what you know. It is **an argument that a specific claim is true, supported by evidence you gathered yourself, written so that a sceptical reader can check every step**.\n\nRead that definition again, because four words in it do a lot of work:\n\n-   **Specific.** \"Malaria in Nigeria\" is a topic. \"Whether distance to the nearest primary health centre predicts delayed malaria treatment among under-fives in Ikorodu LGA\" is a claim you can test. Research writing operates at the second level of specificity, never the first.\n-   **Argument.** Every section of your paper exists to move a reader from \"I have no reason to believe this\" to \"given what you have shown me, I do\". Sections that do not advance the argument are padding, and examiners recognise padding instantly.\n-   **Evidence you gathered.** A paper that only summarises other people's findings is a review, and reviews are a legitimate genre — but a project, thesis or empirical article has to add something. That addition is your data.\n-   **Can check every step.** This is the part most new researchers underestimate. Your reader must be able to see exactly what you did, well enough to do it again and see whether they get the same thing.\n\n## The three audiences you are actually writing for\n\nStudents often write as though the reader were their supervisor, and only their supervisor. That is a mistake with practical consequences. Three different readers will pick up your work, and each of them reads for something different.\n\n**The examiner or reviewer** reads to find out whether the work is sound. They read the methodology closely, check whether your conclusions exceed your evidence, and look for the gap between what you claim and what you showed. This reader is professionally sceptical. They are not being unkind; scepticism is the job.\n\n**The practitioner** reads to find out whether they can use it. A health officer reading your malaria study wants to know the setting, the population and the effect size, so they can judge whether it applies to their own clinic. This reader skips to the abstract, the tables and the recommendations.\n\n**The future researcher** reads to build on it. They want your instrument, your sampling frame and your limitations, because they are deciding whether to replicate you, extend you or correct you. This reader treats your methodology section as a set of instructions.\n\nA well-written paper serves all three without being written three times. It does so through structure — which is the subject of Lesson 3 — and through precision.\n\n## Why the skill is worth the effort\n\nThere is a temptation to treat the research project as an obstacle between you and a certificate: a hurdle to be cleared as cheaply as possible. It is worth spending a moment on what you actually gain, because motivation collapses fastest in students who see no purpose in the exercise.\n\n**It is the most transferable skill in your degree.** The content of your course may date; the ability to define a question, gather evidence about it, weigh that evidence honestly and report it clearly does not. Every consultancy report, policy brief, business case, grant application and investigative article is the same skill wearing different clothes. Employers who cannot assess your knowledge of enzyme kinetics can absolutely assess whether your writing is disciplined.\n\n**It is how you enter a conversation.** Published research is a very long argument that has been running for decades. Learning to write research is learning to say something in that conversation that other people will take seriously — to cite, to be cited, to disagree in a way that advances things rather than just producing noise.\n\n**It protects you from yourself.** The disciplines of research writing — stating your question before you look at the data, pre-specifying what would count as evidence, reporting the results that do not suit you — exist because human beings are extremely good at believing what they want to believe. The format is a set of guardrails.\n\n## What \"good\" looks like\n\nThroughout this course you will be asked to judge writing, not just produce it. It helps to have the criteria explicit from the start. Strong research writing is:\n\n-   **Clear** — a competent reader outside your immediate speciality can follow it on one reading.\n-   **Precise** — every quantity has a unit, every claim has a scope, and words like \"significant\", \"most\" and \"recently\" are either defined or replaced with numbers.\n-   **Honest** — limitations are stated by you, before a reviewer has to find them.\n-   **Traceable** — every claim that is not yours carries a citation, and every citation resolves to a real, findable source.\n-   **Economical** — nothing is included that does not do work. Length is not evidence of effort.\n\nNotice what is absent from that list: elegance, vocabulary, and rhetorical flourish. Beautiful sentences are welcome, but they are not the standard. Nobody has ever failed a defence for writing plainly.\n\n## A common failure, and what it teaches\n\nThe single most common structural failure in student research is the paper that describes a method it never uses. A student writes a competent chapter on questionnaire design, sampling and analysis — and then presents results that could not have come from that design. Perhaps 400 respondents were promised and 61 were reached. Perhaps a regression is reported that the stated data cannot support.\n\nThis happens because the chapters were written as separate assignments rather than as one argument. The fix is not better writing; it is remembering, at every point, that the sections are load-bearing. The methodology exists to make the results credible. The results exist to answer the question the introduction posed. If you can delete a section without weakening the argument, that section was decoration.\n\nThroughout this course you will be pushed to keep the argument in view. When you write your literature review in Module 3, you will be asked what gap it establishes. When you write your methods in Module 4, you will be asked what claim they license.\n\n## What you will produce in this course\n\nBy the end of Module 6 you will have drafted, in order:\n\n1.  A one-page problem statement with aim, objectives and research questions.\n2.  A synthesis matrix of at least fifteen sources, and a themed literature review section written from it.\n3.  A methodology section detailed enough to be replicated.\n4.  A results section with at least one properly formatted table.\n5.  A discussion that interprets rather than repeats, with stated limitations.\n6.  A complete reference list in a single, consistent style.\n\nEach module ends with a practice lesson that produces one of these pieces, and a ten-question quiz that checks you can apply the module rather than merely recall it. Work through them in order; the practice lessons build on each other and the capstone assembles all six.\n\n## Before the next lesson\n\nFind one published paper in your own field — a journal article, not a textbook chapter — and read only its abstract and its conclusion. Ask yourself one question: *what specific claim is this paper arguing for?* If you can state it in a single sentence, the paper is doing its job. If you cannot, you have learned something equally useful about what to avoid.\n\nIn the next lesson we map the different forms research writing takes, from the undergraduate project to the journal article, and what changes between them.\n\n---\n*Mindalitix Academy — Research Writing*","videoUrl":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyTLosz6aHA","isFree":true,"locked":false},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_ab8fyu7","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55a","title":"Lesson 2: Types of Research Writing — Project, Thesis, Article and Report","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_59pkr3t","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55b","title":"Lesson 3: The Anatomy of a Research Paper — IMRaD and Beyond","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_72tfcij","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55c","title":"Lesson 4: Academic Register, Tone and Objectivity","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_co4hl9k","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55d","title":"Lesson 5: Understanding Your Reader — Supervisor, Examiner and Reviewer","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_yqe523z","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55e","title":"Lesson 6: Academic Integrity, Plagiarism and Research Ethics","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_vs2zsrm","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d55f","title":"Lesson 7: Setting Up Your Writing Environment and Workflow","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525582_zmthwzy","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d560","title":"Lesson 8: Practice — Audit a Published Paper Against the IMRaD Structure","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e4","title":"Module 1: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}},{"id":"module_1788548525584_vcm8ona","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d591","title":"Module 2: Finding and Framing a Research Problem","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_ao2sp5m","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d592","title":"Lesson 1: From Broad Interest to Researchable Topic","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_d43empe","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d593","title":"Lesson 2: Identifying a Research Gap","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_tpnxwwz","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d594","title":"Lesson 3: Writing the Problem Statement","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_uya48ni","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d595","title":"Lesson 4: Aim, Objectives, Research Questions and Hypotheses","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_w5nu66y","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d596","title":"Lesson 5: Scope, Delimitations and Limitations","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_9h7114u","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d597","title":"Lesson 6: Significance of the Study","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_eih32eg","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d598","title":"Lesson 7: Feasibility — Time, Access, Data and Ethical Approval","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_5yjztzd","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d599","title":"Lesson 8: Practice — Draft a One-Page Problem Statement","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e5","title":"Module 2: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}},{"id":"module_1788548525584_jdet6gt","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5ca","title":"Module 3: The Literature Review","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_ok722br","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5cb","title":"Lesson 1: What a Literature Review Is (and Is Not)","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_0ajamog","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5cc","title":"Lesson 2: Searching the Literature — Databases, Boolean Logic and Scholar","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_1drsvs3","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5cd","title":"Lesson 3: Screening, Selecting and Reading Efficiently","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_ndxf7fa","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5ce","title":"Lesson 4: Note-Taking and the Synthesis Matrix","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_c45yjto","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5cf","title":"Lesson 5: Organising the Review — Thematic, Chronological and Methodological","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_ul2zbdo","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5d0","title":"Lesson 6: Writing Critically — Reporting Versus Evaluating","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_pemylk5","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5d1","title":"Lesson 7: Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525584_1viecwa","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d5d2","title":"Lesson 8: Practice — Build a Synthesis Matrix and Write a Themed Section","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e6","title":"Module 3: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}},{"id":"module_1788548525585_qxpj98m","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d603","title":"Module 4: Methodology and Results","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_8r6besd","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d604","title":"Lesson 1: Research Design — Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_pfb3knb","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d605","title":"Lesson 2: Population, Sampling and Sample Size","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_jjxd5fo","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d606","title":"Lesson 3: Instruments, Validity and Reliability","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_whqcedt","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d607","title":"Lesson 4: Writing the Data Collection Procedure — So It Can Be Repeated","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_yjy9u8s","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d608","title":"Lesson 5: The Data Analysis Plan and Choosing the Right Test","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_m0e7z6q","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d609","title":"Lesson 6: Presenting Results — Tables, Figures and Statistical Reporting","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_siozvjr","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d60a","title":"Lesson 7: Writing the Results Section Without Interpreting","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_pbcgptt","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d60b","title":"Lesson 8: Practice — Write a Methods Section From a Study Brief","type":"video","duration":9,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e7","title":"Module 4: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}},{"id":"module_1788548525585_pq8tob3","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d63c","title":"Module 5: Discussion, Argument and Style","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_ougl74q","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d63d","title":"Lesson 1: Writing the Discussion — Interpreting, Not Repeating","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_himoi7f","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d63e","title":"Lesson 2: Comparing Your Findings With the Literature","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_pfq08ch","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d63f","title":"Lesson 3: Limitations, Implications and Recommendations","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_dzcghlm","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d640","title":"Lesson 4: Writing the Conclusion and the Abstract","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_ka5mqvd","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d641","title":"Lesson 5: Titles, Keywords and Making Your Work Findable","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_fw9azkv","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d642","title":"Lesson 6: Paragraphing, Cohesion and Flow","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_wnmz2jp","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d643","title":"Lesson 7: Sentence-Level Clarity — Nominalisation, Concision and Hedging","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_2ol1vzp","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d644","title":"Lesson 8: Practice — Rewrite a Weak Discussion Passage","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e8","title":"Module 5: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}},{"id":"module_1788548525585_kq5zrve","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d675","title":"Module 6: Citation, Revision and Publication","lessons":[{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_7shljhu","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d676","title":"Lesson 1: Citation Styles — APA 7, MLA, Harvard and Vancouver","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_vr7v4nr","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d677","title":"Lesson 2: Reference Managers — Zotero and Mendeley","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_889uutu","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d678","title":"Lesson 3: Paraphrasing, Quoting and Summarising in Practice","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_cm4ipkr","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d679","title":"Lesson 4: Using AI Tools Responsibly in Research Writing","type":"video","duration":7,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_63v6n32","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d67a","title":"Lesson 5: Self-Editing, Peer Review and Supervisor Feedback","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_jual3qf","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d67b","title":"Lesson 6: Formatting for Submission — University and Journal Requirements","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_j7u03xh","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d67c","title":"Lesson 7: Choosing a Journal, Submitting and Surviving Peer Review","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true},{"id":"lesson_1788548525585_6xz0msz","_id":"6a9b883d56ee9fb8db61d67d","title":"Lesson 8: Capstone — Assemble a Complete Research Paper","type":"video","duration":8,"content":"","locked":true}],"quiz":{"id":"6a9b15ad19d09b6e5a2a06e9","title":"Module 6: Quiz","passingScore":7,"questionCount":10,"questions":[],"locked":true}}],"price_ngn":45000,"price_usd":0,"publishedAt":"2026-09-04T19:02:05.586Z","rating":0,"ratingCount":0,"status":"published","tags":["research-writing","academic-writing","thesis-writing","dissertation","literature-review","apa-referencing","journal-publication","postgraduate"],"title":"Research Writing","updatedAt":"2026-09-05T03:10:53.299Z","coverImage":"https://res.cloudinary.com/deyjioiwi/image/upload/v1788605437/course-covers/general/faakuzruv0bnxgu45n3e.png","locked":true,"previewLessonId":"lesson_1788548525582_be7tih2"}